Restorative justice today recognizes the act of crime as being directed against individual people.. healing the effects, restoring back to original condition, and making amends to all affected by the crime. Retributive justice focuses on punishment, whereas. Essays Related to Restorative Justice. 1.
There are two distinct kinds of retributive justice. The classical definition embraces the idea that the amount of punishment must be proportional to the amount of harm caused by the offense. A more recent version, supported by Michael Davis, discharges this idea and replaces it with the idea that the amount of punishment must be proportional to the amount of unfair advantage gained by the.
Prevalence of retributive justice found in the holy bible are Leviticus 24: 17-19 “If any person takes lifespan of a person, he must be placed to loss of life. Anyone who takes the life of someone’s animal must make restitution- life forever, fracture to get fracture, vision for eye, tooth to get tooth.
Restorative justice has been shown to be an effective and controversial tool within the justice system, but can it be used as an alternative to retributive justice in today’s modern society? To answer this question firstly what restorative and retributive justice are shall be discussed; this will be followed by how both forms of justice currently stand in modern society.
Restorative justice also looks to develop an evidence headquarters for the use of restorative justice through funding a number of pilots on topics like the relationship between restorative justice and prevention of re-offending, in addition to developing and introducing constructive, practical and valuable guidelines for people working in restorative justice.
The retributive justice holds that the penalties of the crimes are acceptable provided that the penalties are proportional to the damage done. I find restorative justice being better than retributive justice especially when dealing with the offenders, the victimized and the society because of its aim of healing the affected entities.
Punishment is inflicted on the offender neither for his good nor for that of others. It is demanded by the sense of justice. The retributive theory justifies capital punishment under exceptional circumstances. Right to live is the fundamental right. If a person takes away the life of another, Justice demands, that he should be deprived of his life.
Retributive, Utilitarian and Rehabilitative Justice Compared The three justice theories or views, which include utilitarianism, rehabilitative or a retributive style of justice, are multifaceted. It is not easy to sum the aspects of each without lengthy discussion.